Case: 10-60125 Document: 00511163891 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/06/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 6, 2010 No. 10-60125 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk DOCTOR DAISY M. LACOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOCTOR ANNIE KILCREASE, Superintendent; CLAIBORNE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Vicksburg 5:08-CV-00315 Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. Daisy M. Lacour, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claims of sex-based employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when she was fired as principal of the Port Gibson High School during the term of her one-year contract and her state-law claim of tortious interference with business or * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4.  Case: 10-60125 Document: 00511163891 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/06/2010 No. 10-60125 contractual relations. Dr. Lacour also appeals the district court’s denial of her motion and supplemental motion to amend her complaint to add a claim for breach of contract. We have now reviewed the entire record on appeal and have carefully considered the facts and law as presented therein as well as in the briefs of the parties and our independent research. As a result, we are convinced that the district court’s Opinion and Order signed December 28, 2009 granting the Defendants-Appellees’ combined motion for summary judgment was providently granted and that the court’s Opinion and Order signed January 28, 2010 denying Plaintiff-Appellant’s motion and supplemental motion to amend her complaint were proper as well. Accordingly, for the reasons patiently set forth in detail by the district court in its said opinions and orders, the judgments of the district court are, in all respects, AFFIRMED. 2