Filed: Aug. 20, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40055 Conference Calendar PATRICK MAC JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE MEMBERS ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:95-CV-381 - - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Patrick Mac Jackson, Texas inmate #478883, seeks to appeal in for
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40055 Conference Calendar PATRICK MAC JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE MEMBERS ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:95-CV-381 - - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Patrick Mac Jackson, Texas inmate #478883, seeks to appeal in form..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40055
Conference Calendar
PATRICK MAC JACKSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE MEMBERS ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 9:95-CV-381
- - - - - - - - - -
August 19, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Patrick Mac Jackson, Texas inmate #478883, seeks to appeal
in forma pauperis (IFP) the dismissal of his civil rights
complaint. Jackson is BARRED by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from
proceeding IFP because, on at least three prior occasions while
incarcerated, Jackson has brought an action or appeal in a United
States Court that was dismissed for frivolousness, for
maliciousness, or for failure to state a claim for which relief
can be granted. See Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-40055
-2-
Cir. 1996); see also Jackson v. Zeller, No. 96-CV-110 (E.D. Tex.
Feb. 19, 1998); Jackson v. Herklotz, No. 9:95-CV-318 (E.D. Tex.
May 27, 1997); Jackson v. Herklotz, No. G-92-CV-483 (E.D. Tex.
Mar. 27, 1996).
Accordingly, Jackson’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED. He may
not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is
in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical
injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This appeal is DISMISSED.
Jackson has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the
full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district
court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal.
IFP DECERTIFIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.