Fox v. Dual Drilling, 97-30468 (1998)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 97-30468
Filed: Nov. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-30468 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX, Plaintiffs-Appellants versus BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED; BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC Defendants-Appellees **************************************************************** No. 97-30589 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX Plaintiffs-Appellants versus DUAL DRILLING COMPANY, ET AL Defendants PORTER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, doing business as International Paint Protective Coatings; COURTAULDS COATINGS INCORPORATED Defendants-App
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-30468 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX, Plaintiffs-Appellants versus BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED; BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC Defendants-Appellees **************************************************************** No. 97-30589 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX Plaintiffs-Appellants versus DUAL DRILLING COMPANY, ET AL Defendants PORTER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, doing business as International Paint Protective Coatings; COURTAULDS COATINGS INCORPORATED Defendants-Appe..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-30468 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX, Plaintiffs-Appellants versus BP AMERICA, INCORPORATED; BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC Defendants-Appellees **************************************************************** No. 97-30589 JOEY FOX; YOLAND FOX Plaintiffs-Appellants versus DUAL DRILLING COMPANY, ET AL Defendants PORTER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, doing business as International Paint Protective Coatings; COURTAULDS COATINGS INCORPORATED Defendants-Appellees Appeals from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana (94-CV-1485) November 3, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
