Filed: Nov. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40514 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO MARQUEZ-ROMO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-378-1 - - - - - - - - - - November 12, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Marquez-Romo has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40514 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO MARQUEZ-ROMO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-378-1 - - - - - - - - - - November 12, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Marquez-Romo has filed a brief as required by Anders v. ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40514
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO MARQUEZ-ROMO,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-97-CR-378-1
- - - - - - - - - -
November 12, 1998
Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Marquez-Romo has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and Marquez-Romo has filed a response. Our independent review of
the briefs and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
