Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alvidrez v. Johnson, 98-50259 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-50259 Visitors: 30
Filed: Nov. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-50259 Summary Calendar SERGIO HIRAM ALVIDREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CA-432-H - - - - - - - - - - November 2, 1998 Before DAVIS, WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Sergio Hiram Alvidrez, T
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 98-50259
                           Summary Calendar



SERGIO HIRAM ALVIDREZ,

                                            Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

                                            Respondent-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. EP-96-CA-432-H
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                         November 2, 1998

Before DAVIS, WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Sergio Hiram Alvidrez, Texas prisoner No. 512255, has filed

an appeal of the district court’s denial of his § 2254 habeas

corpus petition.   The notice of appeal is treated as an

application for a certificate of appealability (COA) and to

proceed IFP.   See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).     Alvidrez’s request to

proceed IFP is granted, and his motion to correct his appellate

brief is denied as moot.    The district court dismissed the case

based upon the running of the statute of limitations.     COA is

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 98-50259
                               -2-

granted, and the case is vacated and remanded for reconsideration

in light of our opinion in United States v. Flores, 
135 F.3d 1000
, 1005 (5th Cir. 1998).

     COA GRANTED; MOTION TO PROCEED IFP GRANTED; MOTION TO

CORRECT BRIEF DENIED AS MOOT; VACATED AND REMANDED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer