Ramirez v. USA, 98-50352 (1998)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 98-50352
Visitors: 27
Filed: Nov. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-50352 Summary Calendar _ DANIEL A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CV-372-F _ November 11, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See Fifth Circuit Rule 47.6. A F F I R M E
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-50352 Summary Calendar _ DANIEL A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CV-372-F _ November 11, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See Fifth Circuit Rule 47.6. A F F I R M E D..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 98-50352 Summary Calendar _____________________ DANIEL A. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CV-372-F _________________________________________________________________ November 11, 1998 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See Fifth Circuit Rule 47.6. A F F I R M E D. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
