Filed: Dec. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-20986 Summary Calendar SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL COMPANY; SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Counter Defendants-Appellants, versus M/V HOOGEN, ET AL., Defendants, SHIP-SIDE CRATING CO., Defendant-Appellee, POWELL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-1214 - - - - - - - - - -
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 97-20986 Summary Calendar SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL COMPANY; SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Counter Defendants-Appellants, versus M/V HOOGEN, ET AL., Defendants, SHIP-SIDE CRATING CO., Defendant-Appellee, POWELL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-1214 - - - - - - - - - - D..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-20986
Summary Calendar
SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL
COMPANY; SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff-Counter Defendants-Appellants,
versus
M/V HOOGEN, ET AL.,
Defendants,
SHIP-SIDE CRATING CO.,
Defendant-Appellee,
POWELL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-94-CV-1214
- - - - - - - - - -
December 1, 1998
Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Solar Turbines International Company and Solar Turbines,
Inc. (Solar Turbines), appeals the district court’s denial of his
motion for leave to file a third amended complaint arguing that
the district court abused its discretion. We have reviewed the
record and the arguments of the parties and discern no error on
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-20986
-2-
the part of the district court in denying the motion. See Avatar
Exploration, Inc. v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.,
933 F.2d 314, 320
(5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.