Filed: Dec. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20033 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GANTRY LADREW UTLEY, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CR-74-5 - - - - - - - - - - December 2, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gantry Ladrew Utley appeals his conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting the possession
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20033 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GANTRY LADREW UTLEY, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CR-74-5 - - - - - - - - - - December 2, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gantry Ladrew Utley appeals his conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting the possession ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20033
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GANTRY LADREW UTLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-96-CR-74-5
- - - - - - - - - -
December 2, 1998
Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gantry Ladrew Utley appeals his conviction and sentence for
aiding and abetting the possession of cocaine with intent to
distribute on March 11, 1996, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The evidence was not insufficient
to support the conviction. See United States v. El-Zoubi,
993
F.2d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Bermea,
30 F.3d
1539, 1551 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Gonzales,
121 F.3d
928, 936 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied,
118 S. Ct. 726 (1998).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-20033
-2-
The jury was free to infer from taped telephone calls involving
Utley, as interpreted by Utley’s codefendant and cousin, that he
was directly involved in the March 11, 1996, transaction and that
he sought by his actions to make it succeed. See
Gonzales, 121
F.3d at 936.
AFFIRMED.