Filed: Apr. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40193 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAUL IGLESIAS-ALANIS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-238-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 1, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Saul Iglesias-Alanis has filed a motion and brief as require
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40193 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SAUL IGLESIAS-ALANIS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-238-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 1, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Saul Iglesias-Alanis has filed a motion and brief as required..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40193
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SAUL IGLESIAS-ALANIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-97-CR-238-1
- - - - - - - - - -
April 1, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Saul Iglesias-Alanis has filed a
motion and brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Iglesias-Alanis has filed a pro se supplemental
brief in response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief, the record, and the pro se submission discloses
no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.