Filed: Sep. 10, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-40024 Document: 00511229708 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2010 No. 10-40024 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. VINCENTE RIVERA-VIDAL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-821-1 Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PE
Summary: Case: 10-40024 Document: 00511229708 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2010 No. 10-40024 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. VINCENTE RIVERA-VIDAL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CR-821-1 Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER..
More
Case: 10-40024 Document: 00511229708 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 10, 2010
No. 10-40024
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
VINCENTE RIVERA-VIDAL,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:09-CR-821-1
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vincente Rivera-Vidal
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rivera-Vidal has filed a response. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rivera-Vidal’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.