Filed: May 12, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20553 AMERADA HESS CORPORATION; Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TST PARAFFIN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.; Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. PETROSURANCE CASUALTY COMPANY; ESPERANZA LOPEZ MORA; REGINA VALENZUELA, as next friend of BRENDA JANETTE MONTANEZ, a minor and sole heir and representative of the ESTATE of OMAR MONTANEZ; BRENDA JANETTE MONTANEZ, a minor child and sole heir of the ESTATE of OMAR MONTANEZ; and, OMAR MONTANEZ, E
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20553 AMERADA HESS CORPORATION; Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TST PARAFFIN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.; Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. PETROSURANCE CASUALTY COMPANY; ESPERANZA LOPEZ MORA; REGINA VALENZUELA, as next friend of BRENDA JANETTE MONTANEZ, a minor and sole heir and representative of the ESTATE of OMAR MONTANEZ; BRENDA JANETTE MONTANEZ, a minor child and sole heir of the ESTATE of OMAR MONTANEZ; and, OMAR MONTANEZ, ES..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20553 AMERADA HESS CORPORATION; Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TST PARAFFIN SERVICE COMPANY, INC.; Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. PETROSURANCE CASUALTY COMPANY; ESPERANZA LOPEZ MORA; REGINA VALENZUELA, as next friend of BRENDA JANETTE MONTANEZ, a minor and sole heir and representative of the ESTATE of OMAR MONTANEZ; BRENDA JANETTE MONTANEZ, a minor child and sole heir of the ESTATE of OMAR MONTANEZ; and, OMAR MONTANEZ, ESTATE of; Third Party Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-96-CV-163) May 10, 1999 Before JONES, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has considered appellants’ positions in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law and affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
