Filed: Apr. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20685 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GRATINIANO TOVAR-VALENCIA, also known as Carlos Alberto Ramirez-Hurtado, also known as Daniel Gonzalez Velazquez, also known as Grati, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, STEWART, and PARK
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20685 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GRATINIANO TOVAR-VALENCIA, also known as Carlos Alberto Ramirez-Hurtado, also known as Daniel Gonzalez Velazquez, also known as Grati, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, STEWART, and PARKE..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20685
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GRATINIANO TOVAR-VALENCIA, also known as
Carlos Alberto Ramirez-Hurtado, also known as
Daniel Gonzalez Velazquez, also known as Grati,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-97-CR-168-1
- - - - - - - - - -
April 26, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Gratiniano Tovar-Valencia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Tovar-Valencia has
filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the
record, and Tovar-Valencia’s response discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
Tovar-Valencia’s APPEAL is DISMISSED.