Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Russell Hamner v. United States, 10-20311 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 10-20311 Visitors: 32
Filed: Sep. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-20311 Document: 00511248789 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 29, 2010 No. 10-20311 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk RUSSELL HAMNER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CV-1238 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM
More
Case: 10-20311 Document: 00511248789 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 29, 2010 No. 10-20311 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk RUSSELL HAMNER, Plaintiff - Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CV-1238 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Russell Hamner filed a pro se lawsuit against the United States for violations of his First and Tenth Amendment rights. Hamner asserts the government enacted tax laws under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act and the Social Security Act, which by threat of imprisonment, compel “the religious exercises of social care for the poor, needy, and helpless, and homeless.” Hamner also submits that based on an allegedly uncertain reading of Article 1, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-20311 Document: 00511248789 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/29/2010 No. 10-20311 Section 8 of the Constitution, the government “contravened into an arbitrary power via the Social [S]ecurity [A]ct; a power that is constitutionally reserved to the Church.” Hamner appeals the district court’s dismissal of his suit. Largely for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s thoroughly explained report and recommendation, which was adopted by the district court, we AFFIRM. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer