Filed: May 06, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-50798 Summary Calendar CHONITA CRAYTON, Individually and as next friend of Jerome Crayton, II, a minor child, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; JERRY MAJORS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Comal Independent School District; WILL KRIEG, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Principal of Canyon High School; CHARLES ADAMS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assis
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-50798 Summary Calendar CHONITA CRAYTON, Individually and as next friend of Jerome Crayton, II, a minor child, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; JERRY MAJORS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Comal Independent School District; WILL KRIEG, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Principal of Canyon High School; CHARLES ADAMS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assist..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-50798
Summary Calendar
CHONITA CRAYTON, Individually and as next friend
of Jerome Crayton, II, a minor child,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; JERRY MAJORS,
Individually and in his Official Capacity as
Superintendent of the Comal Independent School
District; WILL KRIEG, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Principal of Canyon High School;
CHARLES ADAMS, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Assistant Principal of Canyon High School,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(SA-98-CV-328)
May 6, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-appellant Chonita Crayton, individually and as next
friend of Jerome Crayton, II, a minor child (“Crayton”), appeals
the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the
defendants-appellants. Crayton argues on appeal that she
sufficiently raised genuine issues of material fact in order to
*
Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.
survive a motion for summary judgment on her claims of wrongful
discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964.
Having reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record, we find no
reversible error in the district court’s order. Therefore, we
AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. See Crayton v. Comal
Indep. Sch. Dist., No. SA-98-CA-328 (W.D. Tex. July 16, 1998).
2