Filed: Jun. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40690 Conference Calendar MICHAEL GLENN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MCCONNELL UNIT ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-97-CV-190 - - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Glenn Williams, Texas prisoner # 696404, appeals the district court’s g
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40690 Conference Calendar MICHAEL GLENN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MCCONNELL UNIT ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-97-CV-190 - - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Michael Glenn Williams, Texas prisoner # 696404, appeals the district court’s gr..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40690
Conference Calendar
MICHAEL GLENN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MCCONNELL UNIT ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-97-CV-190
- - - - - - - - - -
June 16, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Glenn Williams, Texas prisoner # 696404, appeals the
district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant in
this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Williams has not adequately
briefed any argument relating to the district court’s grant of
summary judgment. See Grant v. Cuellar,
59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th
Cir. 1995); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,
813
F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-40690
-2-
Williams’ appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The
dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a “strike” for
purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Williams that once
he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma
pauperis (IFP) in any civil action or appeal filed while he is
incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; WARNING ISSUED.