Filed: Jun. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40828 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS VASQUEZ-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-447-4 - - - - - - - - - - June 2, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carlos Vasquez-Munoz appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distri
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40828 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS VASQUEZ-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-447-4 - - - - - - - - - - June 2, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carlos Vasquez-Munoz appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distrib..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40828
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARLOS VASQUEZ-MUNOZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-97-CR-447-4
- - - - - - - - - -
June 2, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carlos Vasquez-Munoz appeals his conviction for possession
with intent to distribute marijuana. He contends solely that the
evidence was insufficient to establish that he knew that the
suburban contained marijuana. We have reviewed the record and
the briefs of the parties and hold that the evidence was
sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Vasquez-Munoz guilty
beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Ortega Reyna, 148
F.3d 540, 544 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
