Filed: Jun. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40925 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY LIN MACCUNE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-158-1 - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Danny Lin Maccune has filed a motion and brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40925 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANNY LIN MACCUNE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-158-1 - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Danny Lin Maccune has filed a motion and brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U...
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40925
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANNY LIN MACCUNE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-158-1
--------------------
June 16, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Danny Lin Maccune has filed a
motion and brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Maccune has not filed a pro se brief in response to
counsel’s motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
