Filed: Jun. 01, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40950 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARRYL CLINTON SHACKELFORD, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-150-1 - - - - - - - - - - May 28, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Darryl Clinton Shackelford appeals his sentence for being a felon in possession of a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40950 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARRYL CLINTON SHACKELFORD, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-150-1 - - - - - - - - - - May 28, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Darryl Clinton Shackelford appeals his sentence for being a felon in possession of a ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40950
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARRYL CLINTON SHACKELFORD,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:97-CR-150-1
- - - - - - - - - -
May 28, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Darryl Clinton Shackelford appeals his sentence for being a
felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g). He argues that he was entitled to a reduction in his
sentence pursuant to § 3E1.1 of the guidelines because he accepted
responsibility for his crime by pleading guilty and admitting the
charged conduct. Shackelford was caught dealing drugs after he was
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-40950
-2-
arrested but before he was indicted. The district court declined
to award an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility because
Shackelford had not voluntarily withdrawn from criminal conduct.
See §3E1.1, comment. (n.1(b)); United States v. Watkins,
911 F.2d
983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s determination was
not without foundation, and was not error. See United States v.
Spires,
79 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.