Filed: Jun. 17, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41002 USDC No. L-98-CV-17 IHAB F. ALMALLAH, Petitioner-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - June 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ihab F. Almallah has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41002 USDC No. L-98-CV-17 IHAB F. ALMALLAH, Petitioner-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - June 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ihab F. Almallah has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 22..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41002
USDC No. L-98-CV-17
IHAB F. ALMALLAH,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent-Appellee.
---------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
---------------------
June 15, 1999
Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ihab F. Almallah has filed a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis (IFP) in this appeal from the district court’s denial of
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellee has filed a motion
to dismiss the appeal as moot and for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies.
After Almallah filed his habeas petition in the district
court, the Board of Immigration Appeals granted his application
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No: 98-41002
-2-
to reopen the deportation proceedings. The exhaustion
requirement is statutorily mandated and is jurisdictional.
Townsend v. United States Dep't of Justice INS,
799 F.2d 179, 181
(5th Cir. 1986). Because Almallah has not exhausted his
administrative remedies with regard to the challenge to his
deportation order, this court lacks jurisdiction to review this
issue. The INS’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Almallah’s
motion for IFP is DENIED AS MOOT.