Filed: Jun. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41229 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus QUINCY J. COOK, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-7-ALL - - - - - - - - - - May 28, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Quincy J. Cook appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Cook a
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41229 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus QUINCY J. COOK, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-7-ALL - - - - - - - - - - May 28, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Quincy J. Cook appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Cook ar..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41229
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
QUINCY J. COOK,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:98-CR-7-ALL
- - - - - - - - - -
May 28, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Quincy J. Cook appeals his conviction for being a felon in
possession of a firearm. Cook argues only that the evidence was
insufficient to prove that the firearm, which had not been
recovered, had traveled in interstate commerce.
We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties
and hold that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury
to find that the firearm had traveled in interstate commerce.
United States v. Gresham,
118 F.3d 258, 265 (5th Cir. 1997),
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-41229
-2-
cert. denied,
118 S. Ct. 702 (1998); United States v. Pierson,
139 F.3d 501, 503 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,
119 S. Ct. 220
(1998).
AFFIRMED.