Filed: Jun. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41242 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHNNIE GONZALES GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-98-CR-119-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Johnnie Gonzales Garcia has moved for leave to
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41242 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHNNIE GONZALES GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-98-CR-119-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Johnnie Gonzales Garcia has moved for leave to w..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41242
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHNNIE GONZALES GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-98-CR-119-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 16, 1999
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Johnnie Gonzales Garcia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garcia has received a
copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.
We have independently reviewed the brief and the record and have
found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.