Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Campos-Salazar, 98-41256 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-41256 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41256 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDRES CAMPOS-SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 98-CR-262-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 15, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Andres Campos-Salazar, the federal public defender
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 98-41256
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDRES CAMPOS-SALAZAR,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.


                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 98-CR-262-1
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                            June 15, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Andres Campos-Salazar, the

federal public defender (FPD), has filed a motion and brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).          Campos-

Salazar has not filed a response.        Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer