Filed: Nov. 19, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 09-41179 Document: 00511300095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 19, 2010 No. 09-41179 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO VILLANUEVA-NAVARRO, also known as Pancho, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:08-CR-190-3 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, an
Summary: Case: 09-41179 Document: 00511300095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 19, 2010 No. 09-41179 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FRANCISCO VILLANUEVA-NAVARRO, also known as Pancho, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:08-CR-190-3 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and..
More
Case: 09-41179 Document: 00511300095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 19, 2010
No. 09-41179
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FRANCISCO VILLANUEVA-NAVARRO, also known as Pancho,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:08-CR-190-3
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Villanueva-Navarro
(Villanueva) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villanueva has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s briefs discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.