Filed: Jun. 11, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 98-51130 Summary Calendar CHAROLETTE A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, VERSUS COMMUNITY BANK/NATIONS BANK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-97-CV-1221) June 11, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:1 DISCUSSION Charolette Williams (“Williams”) worked as a teller for NationsBank at its Community Bank facility on Camp Hansen, a United States
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 98-51130 Summary Calendar CHAROLETTE A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, VERSUS COMMUNITY BANK/NATIONS BANK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (SA-97-CV-1221) June 11, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:1 DISCUSSION Charolette Williams (“Williams”) worked as a teller for NationsBank at its Community Bank facility on Camp Hansen, a United States ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 98-51130
Summary Calendar
CHAROLETTE A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
VERSUS
COMMUNITY BANK/NATIONS BANK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(SA-97-CV-1221)
June 11, 1999
Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:1
DISCUSSION
Charolette Williams (“Williams”) worked as a teller for
NationsBank at its Community Bank facility on Camp Hansen, a United
States Marine Corps base in Okinawa, Japan. She was employed in
that capacity from August 1995 until her discharge in March 1997.
Williams sued NationsBank in federal district court, asserting: (1)
Title VII discrimination and retaliation; (2) Equal Pay Act
violations; (3) denial of due process; (4) conspiracy to terminate
1
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
her and defraud the United States; and (5) violations of federal
laws protecting whistle blowers.
In July 1998, NationsBank moved for summary judgment and the
magistrate judge recommended that the motion be granted. Adopting
the magistrate’s recommendations, the district court granted
summary judgment in favor of NationsBank. Williams appeals.
We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Lawrence v.
Univ. of Tex. Med. Branch at Galveston,
163 F.3d 309, 311 (5th Cir.
1999). After a careful review of the briefs and the record, we
conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment
for NationsBank.
CONCLUSION
We affirm the summary judgment in favor of NationsBank.
AFFIRMED.
2