Filed: Dec. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 08-30576 Document: 00511314986 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 08-30576 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY HONEYCUT, also known as Ray, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CR-258-2 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circu
Summary: Case: 08-30576 Document: 00511314986 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 08-30576 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY HONEYCUT, also known as Ray, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:03-CR-258-2 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circui..
More
Case: 08-30576 Document: 00511314986 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 8, 2010
No. 08-30576
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ANTHONY HONEYCUT, also known as Ray,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:03-CR-258-2
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anthony Honeycut
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Honeycut has filed a response. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Honeycut’s response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.