Case: 10-20322 Document: 00511315320 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                          December 8, 2010
                                     No. 10-20322
                                  Conference Calendar                       Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GILBERTO PEREZ PARDON, also known as Gilberto P. Perez, also known as
Gilberto Perez, also known as Jose Flores, also known as Gilberto Padron Perez,
also known as Gilberto Perez-Padron, also known as Robert Garza Perez, also
known as Guillermo Perez,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant


                    Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Texas
                              USDC No. 4:09-CR-670-1


Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto Perez Pardon
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 

(1967). Perez Pardon has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal.       Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 10-20322 Document: 00511315320 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2010

                               No. 10-20322

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.




                                    2