Filed: Dec. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-40104 Document: 00511315325 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 10-40104 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN FRANCISCO JIMENEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-782-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges
Summary: Case: 10-40104 Document: 00511315325 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 10-40104 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN FRANCISCO JIMENEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:09-CR-782-1 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges...
More
Case: 10-40104 Document: 00511315325 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 8, 2010
No. 10-40104
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN FRANCISCO JIMENEZ-GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:09-CR-782-1
Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Juan Francisco Jimenez-Garcia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jimenez-Garcia has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.