Filed: Jul. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-31268 Summary Calendar CECELIA BOUDREAUX, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (97-CV-498-E) July 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals a jury verdict and judgment of $82,493.09 for Plaintiff Cecelia Boudreaux in this personal injury case. We affirm. Boudreaux t
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-31268 Summary Calendar CECELIA BOUDREAUX, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (97-CV-498-E) July 15, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals a jury verdict and judgment of $82,493.09 for Plaintiff Cecelia Boudreaux in this personal injury case. We affirm. Boudreaux tr..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-31268
Summary Calendar
CECELIA BOUDREAUX,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
(97-CV-498-E)
July 15, 1999
Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals a jury verdict and judgment of
$82,493.09 for Plaintiff Cecelia Boudreaux in this personal injury
case. We affirm.
Boudreaux tripped and fell over a pallet left in an aisle in
the Wal-mart Store located in Harvey, Louisiana, injuring her back
and wrist. The jury found that Wal-mart and Boudreaux were each
fifty percent negligent in causing the accident and found that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
Boudreaux suffered $164,986.17 in damages. The district court
reduced the damage award to $82,493.09, reflecting Boudreaux’s
comparative fault, and entered judgment.
Wal-Mart appeals, arguing that the evidence was not sufficient
to support either liability or the damages awarded. We must affirm
a jury verdict, unless reasonable and impartial minds could not
have reached the conclusion the jury expressed in its verdict. See
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Falgoust,
386 F.2d 248, 253 (5th Cir.
1967). After reviewing the record, we find that the jury’s verdict
as to both liability and damages is supported by the evidence.
AFFIRMED.
2