Filed: Dec. 27, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 10-50515 Document: 00511332504 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 27, 2010 No. 10-50515 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk EUGENE REED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CV-381 Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* P
Summary: Case: 10-50515 Document: 00511332504 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 27, 2010 No. 10-50515 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk EUGENE REED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CV-381 Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Pl..
More
Case: 10-50515 Document: 00511332504 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 27, 2010 No. 10-50515 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk EUGENE REED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:09-CV-381 Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiff-Appellant Eugene Reed appeals the district court’s grant of the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant-Appellee Texas Department of Transportation (“DOTD”), dismissing Reed’s employment discrimination action grounded in disparate treatment on the basis of race. We have reviewed the entire record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties and the applicable * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-50515 Document: 00511332504 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/27/2010 No. 10-50515 law as presented therein and as independently determined, and are satisfied that the judgment of the district court should be, and hereby is, AFFIRMED. 2
