Filed: Jun. 25, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 98-60302 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60302 Summary Calendar MOHAMMED ABDIRAHMAN, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A74-672-922 - - - - - - - - - - June 24, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This is a petition for review for the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order refusing to accept
Summary: No. 98-60302 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60302 Summary Calendar MOHAMMED ABDIRAHMAN, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A74-672-922 - - - - - - - - - - June 24, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This is a petition for review for the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order refusing to accept ..
More
No. 98-60302
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60302
Summary Calendar
MOHAMMED ABDIRAHMAN,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - -
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
A74-672-922
- - - - - - - - - -
June 24, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This is a petition for review for the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (BIA) order refusing to accept for certification Mohammed
Abdirahman’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of
Abdirahman’s motion to reopen deportation proceedings. The BIA’s
summary dismissal of the appeal as untimely was not an abuse of
discretion. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(d), 3.3(a)(1), 3.38(b), and
3.38(c); see also Arzanipour v. INS,
866 F.2d 743, 745 (5th Cir.
1989). Abdirahman’s argument that the BIA should have certified
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-60302
-2-
his appeal for review despite its untimeliness for the reasons
counsel offered in her affidavit lacks merit. Abdirahman’s
petition for review of the BIA’s order is DENIED.