Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11301 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KIMBERLY LYNN JONES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-063-01-C - - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kimberly Lynn Jones, pr
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11301 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KIMBERLY LYNN JONES, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-063-01-C - - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kimberly Lynn Jones, pri..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11301
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KIMBERLY LYNN JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:98-CR-063-01-C
- - - - - - - - - -
August 26, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kimberly
Lynn Jones, prisoner number 29931-077, has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief, but she has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the record and brief shows that there
are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Consequently, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.