Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Davila-Martinez, 98-11500 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-11500 Visitors: 29
Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11500 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE JAVIER DAVILA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:98-CR-25-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Javier Davila-Martinez has moved for leave to with
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 98-11500
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE JAVIER DAVILA-MARTINEZ,

                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Northern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 2:98-CR-25-1
                        --------------------

                            August 24, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

Javier Davila-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Davila-Martinez has filed a response.      Our independent

review of the brief, the record, and Davila-Martinez’s response

discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                              No.
                              -2-

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer