Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20307 Conference Calendar JULIUS DANIEL JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOHNNY B. HOLMES; FRANK HARMON; RASHAD, MAGISTRATE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CV-3844 - - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20307 Conference Calendar JULIUS DANIEL JOSEPH, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOHNNY B. HOLMES; FRANK HARMON; RASHAD, MAGISTRATE, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CV-3844 - - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY a..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-20307
Conference Calendar
JULIUS DANIEL JOSEPH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOHNNY B. HOLMES;
FRANK HARMON; RASHAD, MAGISTRATE,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-96-CV-3844
- - - - - - - - - -
August 26, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Julius Daniel Joseph, Texas prisoner # 617774, appeals the
district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as
time-barred and therefore frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
According to Joseph’s complaint, the conduct of which he
complains occurred in 1981, approximately 15 years before he
filed his § 1983 complaint in 1996. The district court did not
abuse its discretion in concluding that under the applicable two-
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-20307
-2-
year statute of limitations, see Ali v. Higgs,
892 F.2d 438, 439
(5th Cir. 1990), Joseph’s § 1983 action was time-barred. See
McCormick v. Stalder,
105 F.3d 1059, 1061 (5th Cir. 1997)(abuse-
of-discretion standard governs review of § 1915(e) dismissals).
AFFIRMED.