Standard Finance Inc v. St James Parish, 98-30470 (1999)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 98-30470
Visitors: 32
Filed: Sep. 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-30470 _ STANDARD FINANCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ST. JAMES PARISH; SOUTHERN GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE CORPORATION; VONDRA K. DRONE; JACK E. KOSLOW; ASCENSION PARISH; ST. CHARLES PARISH; ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH; WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CV-1666) _ September 13, 1999 Before DUHE, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-30470 _ STANDARD FINANCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ST. JAMES PARISH; SOUTHERN GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE CORPORATION; VONDRA K. DRONE; JACK E. KOSLOW; ASCENSION PARISH; ST. CHARLES PARISH; ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH; WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, Defendants-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CV-1666) _ September 13, 1999 Before DUHE, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _________________ No. 98-30470 _________________ STANDARD FINANCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ST. JAMES PARISH; SOUTHERN GOVERNMENTAL FINANCE CORPORATION; VONDRA K. DRONE; JACK E. KOSLOW; ASCENSION PARISH; ST. CHARLES PARISH; ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH; WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH, Defendants-Appellees. _____________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CV-1666) ______________________________________________ September 13, 1999 Before DUHE, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM:* AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. Rule 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
