Filed: Sep. 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-30563 LUTHER HUNT; ROBERT LECOMPT; LANDON ALEXANDER, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus MICHAEL I. BERNSTEIN; ET AL., Defendants, RICHARD WINGATE; BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CV-1103) September 13, 1999 Before POLITZ, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the dismissal of thei
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-30563 LUTHER HUNT; ROBERT LECOMPT; LANDON ALEXANDER, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus MICHAEL I. BERNSTEIN; ET AL., Defendants, RICHARD WINGATE; BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CV-1103) September 13, 1999 Before POLITZ, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the dismissal of their..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-30563 LUTHER HUNT; ROBERT LECOMPT; LANDON ALEXANDER, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus MICHAEL I. BERNSTEIN; ET AL., Defendants, RICHARD WINGATE; BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CV-1103) September 13, 1999 Before POLITZ, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the dismissal of their action. Having considered the briefs, oral arguments of counsel, and all relevant matters of record considered by the district court in determining the court’s jurisdiction in this matter, and finding no reversible error, the rulings by the district court are AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
