Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40826 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO TENORIO-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-196-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Roberto Tenorio-Rojas (Tenorio) appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to transporting an alien within the
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40826 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERTO TENORIO-ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-196-1 - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Roberto Tenorio-Rojas (Tenorio) appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to transporting an alien within the U..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40826
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO TENORIO-ROJAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-196-1
--------------------
August 24, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Roberto Tenorio-Rojas (Tenorio) appeals his sentence after
pleading guilty to transporting an alien within the United
States. For the first time on appeal, he contends that the
district court, in making his six-month sentence for the instant
offense run consecutively to the term imposed for violating
probation, did not follow the usual procedures for departing from
the Sentencing Guidelines and relied on factors that had already
been considered by the Guidelines. The Government argues that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-40826
-2-
Tenorio waived his right to appeal his sentence in his plea
agreement.
A defendant may waive his statutory right to appeal his
sentence as part of a valid plea agreement. United States v.
Melancon,
972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). Tenorio’s appeal
brief does not address the waiver issue. This appeal is wholly
without merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d
215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is
dismissed. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.