Filed: Aug. 25, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40941 Conference Calendar BRUCE PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; A. J. COLLINS, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-96-CV-707 - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bruce Petty, Texas prisoner # 541160, appea
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40941 Conference Calendar BRUCE PETTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; A. J. COLLINS, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-96-CV-707 - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bruce Petty, Texas prisoner # 541160, appeal..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40941
Conference Calendar
BRUCE PETTY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT
OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION;
A. J. COLLINS,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. G-96-CV-707
--------------------
August 25, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bruce Petty, Texas prisoner # 541160, appeals the district
court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous.
Petty argues, as he did in the district court, that the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice’s policy of allowing female prison
guards to be present when male prisoners are showering and other
times when male prisoners are naked is cruel and unusual
punishment and violates his constitutional right to privacy.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-40941
-2-
The presence of female prison guards for security reasons on
those occasions when male prisoners are naked is not a
constitutional violation. See Letcher v. Turner,
968 F.2d 508,
510 (5th Cir. 1992). Petty’s claim lacked an arguable basis in
law, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in
dismissing the complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower,
112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED.