Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Chavez-Martinez, 99-10017 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-10017 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 03, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10017 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN MANUEL CHAVEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-309-ALL-T - - - - - - - - - - Aguust 26, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Manuel Ch
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 99-10017
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL CHAVEZ-MARTINEZ,

                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                   USDC No. 3:98-CR-309-ALL-T
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                            Aguust 26, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

    The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan

Manuel Chavez-Martinez has moved to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Chavez-Martinez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief

but has not filed a response.    Our independent review of the

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.       Counsel is




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                                No.
                                -2-

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer