Filed: Aug. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10290 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN LEE KARDARAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-176-1-A - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Kevin Lee Kardaras, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as require
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10290 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN LEE KARDARAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-176-1-A - August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel for Kevin Lee Kardaras, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10290
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEVIN LEE KARDARAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:98-CR-176-1-A
--------------------
August 24, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court appointed counsel for Kevin Lee Kardaras, has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Kardaras has not responded.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
