Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Chavana-Solis, 99-40309 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-40309 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40309 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE JAVIER CHAVANA-SOLIS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-429-1 - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Javier Chavana-Solis has moved for leave to withdra
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 99-40309
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE JAVIER CHAVANA-SOLIS,

                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. M-98-CR-429-1
                       --------------------

                            August 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

Javier Chavana-Solis has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Chavana has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief but has not filed a response.    Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                       No.
                       -2-

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer