Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Pineda, 98-40820 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-40820 Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 28, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (98-CR-3-2) - - - - - - - - - - September 28, 1999 Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Antonio Pineda appeals from his jury conviction for possession with the intent to distribute her
More
                    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                            FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                  No. 98-40820
                                Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANTONIO PINEDA,

                                                Defendant-Appellant.

                          - - - - - - - - - -
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Texas
                              (98-CR-3-2)
                          - - - - - - - - - -

                               September 28, 1999

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jose Antonio Pineda appeals from his jury conviction for

possession with the intent to distribute heroin and distribution of

heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).           Pineda argues that

the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.          We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The evidence was

sufficient     to    support   Pineda’s   conviction.    Accordingly,   the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer