United States v. Pineda, 98-40820 (1999)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 98-40820
Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 28, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (98-CR-3-2) - - - - - - - - - - September 28, 1999 Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Antonio Pineda appeals from his jury conviction for possession with the intent to distribute her
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40820 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (98-CR-3-2) - - - - - - - - - - September 28, 1999 Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Antonio Pineda appeals from his jury conviction for possession with the intent to distribute hero..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40820
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE ANTONIO PINEDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
(98-CR-3-2)
- - - - - - - - - -
September 28, 1999
Before POLITZ, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Antonio Pineda appeals from his jury conviction for
possession with the intent to distribute heroin and distribution of
heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pineda argues that
the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The evidence was
sufficient to support Pineda’s conviction. Accordingly, the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener