Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wade v. Johnson, 98-20250 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 98-20250 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 24, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-20250 Summary Calendar JOHN IKE WADE, Petitioner-Appellant, versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CV-1740 - November 23, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Ike Wade, Texas prisoner No. 646142, moves for release p
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 98-20250
                           Summary Calendar


JOHN IKE WADE,

                                           Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

                                           Respondent-Appellee.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-97-CV-1740
                       --------------------

                           November 23, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     John Ike Wade, Texas prisoner No. 646142, moves for release

pending appeal.    The motion is DENIED.   We VACATE the dismissal

as time-barred of a federal habeas petition filed by Wade.      The

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) limitations period was tolled by the pendency

of Wade’s second and third state habeas petitions.       See Villegas

v. Johnson, 
184 F.3d 467
, 469 (5th Cir. 1999).    Accordingly, the

judgment of dismissal is VACATED and the case is remanded to the

district court for further proceedings in light of Villegas.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                     No. 98-20250
                          -2-

VACATED AND REMANDED; RELEASE PENDING APPEAL DENIED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer