Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41593 Conference Calendar HOWARD LEE BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ALLAN B. POLUNSKY, Board of Criminal Justice; WAYNE SCOTT; MIKE WILSON, Warden, Michael Unit; WILLIAM JOCK, Lieutenant, Michael Unit; TRAVIS FEARS, Correctional Officer III, Michael Unit; LEONARD P. RIGAMONTI; JOHN K. SHEAD, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:98-CV-442 - December
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-41593 Conference Calendar HOWARD LEE BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ALLAN B. POLUNSKY, Board of Criminal Justice; WAYNE SCOTT; MIKE WILSON, Warden, Michael Unit; WILLIAM JOCK, Lieutenant, Michael Unit; TRAVIS FEARS, Correctional Officer III, Michael Unit; LEONARD P. RIGAMONTI; JOHN K. SHEAD, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:98-CV-442 - December 1..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-41593
Conference Calendar
HOWARD LEE BARNES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ALLAN B. POLUNSKY, Board of Criminal Justice;
WAYNE SCOTT; MIKE WILSON, Warden, Michael Unit;
WILLIAM JOCK, Lieutenant, Michael Unit;
TRAVIS FEARS, Correctional Officer III, Michael Unit;
LEONARD P. RIGAMONTI; JOHN K. SHEAD,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:98-CV-442
--------------------
December 16, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Howard Lee Barnes, Texas prisoner No. 647284, appeals the
district court’s entry of summary judgement dismissing his claims
against defendants Polunsky, Scott, and Wilson, and dismissing
certain of his claims against defendants Jock and Fears.
This court must examine sua sponte the basis of its own
jurisdiction, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-41593
-2-
(5th Cir. 1987). As the district court’s judgment was not final
as to all parties, we lack appellate jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. The APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.