Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10342 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARCARNLY CROSS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-41-1 - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larcarnly Cross appeals the sentence imposed for his guilty plea conviction of distribution of less than 500 grams of co
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10342 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARCARNLY CROSS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:98-CR-41-1 - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larcarnly Cross appeals the sentence imposed for his guilty plea conviction of distribution of less than 500 grams of coc..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10342
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARCARNLY CROSS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:98-CR-41-1
--------------------
December 15, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larcarnly Cross appeals the sentence imposed for his guilty
plea conviction of distribution of less than 500 grams of
cocaine. Cross argues that he is entitled to a two-point
reduction in his base offense level for acceptance of
responsibility under United States Sentencing Guideline § 3E1.1,
despite twice testing positive for cocaine usage while on release
pending sentencing.
We will uphold the district court’s decision to deny a
reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-10342
-2-
unless it is without foundation. United States v. Brace,
145
F.3d 247, 264 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied,
119 S. Ct. 426
(1998). The district court’s decision not to award the reduction
to Cross is not without foundation. See United States v.
Watkins,
911 F.2d 983, 985 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s
judgment is AFFIRMED.