Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10491 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL CHARLES JONES, also known as Slim, also known as Silky Slim, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-303-ALL-P - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Char
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10491 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL CHARLES JONES, also known as Slim, also known as Silky Slim, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-303-ALL-P - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael Charl..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10491
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL CHARLES JONES, also known as Slim,
also known as Silky Slim,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:98-CR-303-ALL-P
--------------------
December 15, 1999
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Michael
Charles Jones has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
