Filed: Dec. 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10632 Summary Calendar LAYALE ENTERPRISES, S.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS HMS AVIATION, ET AL., Defendants, and THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN, Intervenor Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:98-CV-671-Y) December 3, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Voluntary intervenor, Kingdom of Jordan, appeals the district court's decision to
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10632 Summary Calendar LAYALE ENTERPRISES, S.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS HMS AVIATION, ET AL., Defendants, and THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN, Intervenor Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (4:98-CV-671-Y) December 3, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Voluntary intervenor, Kingdom of Jordan, appeals the district court's decision to r..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10632
Summary Calendar
LAYALE ENTERPRISES, S.A.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS
HMS AVIATION, ET AL.,
Defendants,
and
THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN,
Intervenor Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(4:98-CV-671-Y)
December 3, 1999
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Voluntary intervenor, Kingdom of Jordan, appeals the
district court's decision to remand this matter to state court
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1447(d) (1994), we are without appellate jurisdiction to review
the district court's remand order. See Angelides v. Baylor
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
College of Medicine,
117 F.3d 833, 835 (5th Cir. 1997); see also
Smith v. Texas Children's Hosp.,
172 F.3d 923, 925 (5th Cir.
1999) (“When a remand is ordered under § 1447(c), the remand
order is not reviewable, even if a court employs erroneous
principles in concluding that it is without jurisdiction under §
1447(c).”) (remand order based on lack of subject matter
jurisdiction). For these reasons, we decline to review this
matter.
Intervenor defendant's motion to expedite appeal and
schedule oral argument is denied as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED
-2-