Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Batres-Ortega, 99-40231 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-40231 Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40231 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOAQUIN BATRES-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-551-ALL - - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joaquin Batres-Ortega (B
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 99-40231
                         Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOAQUIN BATRES-ORTEGA,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                    USDC No. B-98-CR-551-ALL
                       - - - - - - - - - -

                          December 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joaquin

Batres-Ortega (Batres) has requested leave to withdraw as counsel

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Batres has received a copy of counsel’s motion

and brief but has not filed a response.   Our independent review

of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                No.
                -2-

is DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer