Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Whitley v. Capital Metro Transt, 99-50080 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-50080 Visitors: 44
Filed: Dec. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50080 ANNIE L. WHITLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, STARTRAN, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-97-CV-674-SC) December 14, 1999 Before POLITZ, GARWOOD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Annie L. Whitley, a black female, challenges the district court’s order dismissing her Title VII action against her employer, Capital
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50080 ANNIE L. WHITLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS CAPITAL METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, STARTRAN, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-97-CV-674-SC) December 14, 1999 Before POLITZ, GARWOOD and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Annie L. Whitley, a black female, challenges the district court’s order dismissing her Title VII action against her employer, Capital Metropolitan Transit. Appellant argues that a factfinder could infer from the summary judgment evidence presented that the employer applied the "changeout" rule against her in a discriminatory fashion. Our review of the record persuades us that fact issues were presented as to whether the work rule at issue was applied to Whitley in a discriminatory fashion and whether her discharge was related to this application of the work rule. Because fact issues are presented, the district court erred in * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. granting summary judgment. The order of the district court is therefore vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings. VACATED and REMANDED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer