Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Godina-Hernandez, 99-50355 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-50355 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50355 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS MARTIN GODINA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-98-CR-417-ALL - December 15, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Martin Godina-Hernandez has moved for leave
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 99-50355
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CARLOS MARTIN GODINA-HERNANDEZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                     USDC No. SA-98-CR-417-ALL
                        --------------------

                         December 15, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos

Martin Godina-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Godina-Hernandez has not filed a response.   Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 99-50355
                               -2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer