Filed: Jan. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 98-30477 & 98-30820 _ P J HAHN, Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF KENNER; ET AL, Defendants, CITY OF KENNER; LOUIS CONGEMI, individually and as Mayor for the City of Kenner; NICK CONGEMI, individually and as Chief of Police for the City of Kenner; ANTHONY LOMBARD, Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-2425-L) _ January 1
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 98-30477 & 98-30820 _ P J HAHN, Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF KENNER; ET AL, Defendants, CITY OF KENNER; LOUIS CONGEMI, individually and as Mayor for the City of Kenner; NICK CONGEMI, individually and as Chief of Police for the City of Kenner; ANTHONY LOMBARD, Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-2425-L) _ January 11..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ Nos. 98-30477 & 98-30820 _____________________ P J HAHN, Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF KENNER; ET AL, Defendants, CITY OF KENNER; LOUIS CONGEMI, individually and as Mayor for the City of Kenner; NICK CONGEMI, individually and as Chief of Police for the City of Kenner; ANTHONY LOMBARD, Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-2425-L) _________________________________________________________________ January 11, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The merits of the district court’s decisions on the motions for summary judgment are not presented to us on this appeal. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees as set out in its Order and Reasons entered April 13, 1998. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
